Hi Everybody!!
I was enjoying Sunday Morning under the bluest skies with no alien clouds overhead. I made good progress on the garden. As I was walking to the cabin to have some eggs and toast, I saw the Big Jet flying straight over my road in front. It looked like thick white poop coming out of the jet leaving the Big trails in the sky. I was inside for about 15 minutes. I could not believe what I saw when I walked back outside to the garden---an explosion in the sky of the structure clouds that form the dome. Something went wrong because this dome shield formed faster than any of the others. Then the smaller jets came in spraying the swirling dust clouds that covered the web frame. Sky King (the project manager of Sky Poop) had to fly his little toy jet as fast as it would go to get out the blue sky before it sealed off.
I did a vid at the end of the post of this photoshoot showing cloud creation.
Also, You will see below, that once I found the correct name: Solar Radiation Management, I found all the info to share with You. (Yes, Google Knew!)
My friends, we need to get these idiots out of the sky. They do not have good intentions to make the decision to interfere with the weather systems of the planet without telling anyone. I am so sick from this dust as are the other old ladies that live onmy street. Please share my blog. Please spread the word.
It is after midnight. I just went out to look at the full moon. So many clouds are streaming North at a rapid rate. I can see no end to the clouds. Please take care as this storm approaches You.
Someone has created a dangerous situation. Please photograph all the planes doing these things. No Fear.
"SKY KING" If he comes close enough to the ground, I am going to rope him out of the sky. Anybody know who he is????
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIC5vnthZg4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yy3YJBOw_o
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_radiation_management
Solar radiation management
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Solar radiation management[1] (SRM) projects are a largely theoretical type of geoengineering which seek to reflect sunlight and thus reduce global warming.[2] Proposed examples include the creation of stratospheric sulfur aerosols. They would not reduce greenhouse gas concentrations in theatmosphere, and thus do not address problems such as ocean acidificationcaused by these gases. Their principal advantages as an approach to geoengineering is the speed with which they can be deployed and become fully active, as well as their low financial cost. By comparison, other geoengineering techniques based on greenhouse gas remediation, such as ocean iron fertilization, need to sequester the anthropogenic carbon excess before they can arrest global warming. Solar radiation management projects can therefore be used as a geoengineering 'quick fix' while levels ofgreenhouse gases can be brought under control by greenhouse gas remediation techniques.
A study by Lenton and Vaughan suggest that marine cloud brightening andstratospheric sulfur aerosols are each capable of reversing the warming effect of a doubling of the level of CO2 in the atmosphere (when compared to pre-industrial levels).
Background
The phenomenon of global dimming is widely known, and is not necessarily a geoengineering technique. It occurs in normal conditions, due to aerosols caused by pollution, or caused naturally as a result of volcanoes and major forest fires. However, its deliberate manipulation is a tool of the geoengineer. The majority of recent global dimming has been in the troposphere, except that resulting from volcanos, which affect mainly the stratosphere.
By intentionally changing the Earth's albedo, or reflectivity, scientists propose that we could reflect more heat back out into space, or intercept sunlight before it reaches the Earth through a literal shade built in space. A 0.5% albedo increase would roughly halve the effect of CO2doubling.[4]
These geoengineering projects have been proposed in order to reduce global warming. The effect of rising greenhouse gas concentrations in theatmosphere on global climate is a warming effect on the planet. By modifying the albedo (whiteness) of the Earth's surface, or by preventing sunlight reaching the Earth by using a solar shade, this warming effect can be cancelled out — although the cancellation is imperfect, with regional discrepancies remaining.[5]
The applicability of many techniques listed here has not been comprehensively tested. Even if the effects in computer simulation models or of small-scale interventions are known, there may be cumulative problems such as ozone depletion, which only become apparent from large scale experiments.[6]
Various small-scale experiments have been carried out on techniques such as cloud seeding, increasing the volume of stratospheric sulfur aerosols and implementing cool roof technology.
As early as 1974, Russian expert Mikhail Budyko suggested that if global warming became a problem, we could cool down the planet by burning sulfur in the stratosphere, which would create a haze. Paul Crutzen suggests that this would cost 25 to 50 billion dollars per year. It would, however, increase the environmental problem of acid rain.[7][8][9] However, this is now believed to be a minor side effect.[10]
A preliminary study by Edward Teller and others in 1997 presented the pros and cons of various relatively "low-tech" proposals to mitigate global warming through scattering/reflecting sunlight away from the Earth via insertion of various materials in the upper stratosphere, low earth orbit, and L1 locations.[11]
Limitations
As well as the imperfect cancellation of the effect of greenhouse gases on global warming, there are other significant problems with solar radiation management as a from of geoengineering not least of these are effects on the global hydrological cycle[12] and the inability of such techniques to reduce ocean acidification.
Particular to solar radiation management, a risk of abrupt cessation exists. If SRM were to abruptly stop, the climate would rapidly warm.[13]This would cause a sudden rise in global temperatures towards levels which would have existed without the use of the geoengineering technique. The rapid rise in temperature may lead to more severe consequences than a gradual rise of the same magnitude.[13]
[edit]Atmospheric projects
These projects seek to modify the atmosphere, either by enhancing natural processes such as the sulfur cycle, or by using artificial techniques such as reflective balloons.
[edit]Stratospheric aerosols
Main article: Stratospheric aerosols (geoengineering)
Methods based on increasing the aerosol content in the lower stratosphere for climate modification were proposed by a Russian scientist, Budyko.[14]
Stratospheric sulfur aerosols: proposed by Paul Crutzen,[8] with the purpose to modify the Earth's albedo with reflective or absorptive materials spread over portions of its surface. This would typically be achieved using hydrogen sulfide or sulfur dioxide, delivered using artillery, aircraft(such as the high-flying F15-C) or balloons.[8][15][16][17] [18] (Alternative approaches using photophoretic particles have been proposed.[19])Ozone depletion is a risk of such techniques,[20] but only if high enough quantities of aerosols drift to, or are deposited in, polar stratospheric clouds before the levels of CFCs and other ozone destroying gases fall naturally to safe levels because CFCs can settle on larger sulfate particles, increasing their ozone destroying potential.[21] This proposal, not unlike the others, carries with it considerable risks, including increased drought[22] or acid rain.[23]
Broadly speaking, this technique is seen as a credible geoengineering scheme, although not one without major risks, and challenges for its implementation. This technique can give >3.7W/m2 of globally averaged negative forcing,[3] which is sufficient to entirely offset the warming caused by a doubling of CO2.
Sulfate is the most commonly proposed aerosol for geoengineering, since there is a good natural analogue with volcanic eruptions. Explosive eruptions inject large amounts of sulfur dioxide gas into the stratosphere, which form sulfate aerosol. Studies of the Earth's climate have shown that such aerosol can achieve significant cooling. Sulfate aerosols have been shown to enhance ozone depletion. However, other aerosol types may be more efficient at cooling the climate or less damaging to the ozone layer. Such aerosols include the highly reflective titanium dioxide.
United States Patent 5003186 suggested that tiny metal flakes could be "added to the fuel of jet airliners, so that the particles would be emitted from the jet engine exhaust while the airliner was at its cruising altitude." Alternative proposals, not known to have been published in peer-reviewed journals, include the addition of silicon compounds to jet fuel to make silicon dioxide particles in the exhaust.[24]
A more sophisticated approach, using multi-layered nanoparticles (consisting of aluminum and barium titanate), was published by David Keithin 2010. He suggests utilizing the effects of photophoresis to increase the amount of time the aerosols stay airborne.[25]
Working with Pat Mooney, David Keith has also developed an experiment involving the release of sun-reflecting sulphate from a balloon more than 80,000 feet above Fort Sumner in New Mexico to replicate the cooling effects of volcanoes.[26]
Alleged secret experiments with aircraft exhaust modification are one version of the Chemtrail conspiracy theory.[27]
In 1992, a report by the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS)[28] on geoengineering noted that dust is a better choice compared to sulphur, because dust is from natural soil and so should have no noticeable effect on the ground as it gradually falls into the troposphere and rains out. It estimated that about 1010 kg dust would be required to mitigate the warming from a doubling of atmospheric CO2 or about 1 kg dust per 100 t of carbon emissions.
An example of the effects of the imposition of aerosol particles in the atmosphere can be found in history. Comets have been blamed for the dramatic but brief cooling period which commenced in 1159 BCE, and resulted in widespread disruption to civilisations at the time.[30] However, this mechanism, and even the involvement of a comet, is not universally accepted. If a comet was indeed to blame, the action of its aerosolscould also have been by the mechanism of cloud condensation nuclei. Other examples of climate change events linked to comets include the famines around 536 CE.
Reflective balloons
Placing billions of aluminized, hydrogen-filled balloons in the stratosphere has been suggested to provide a reflective screen.[11][37][44][45]
These reflectors would be placed at a high enough altitude so that they do not interfere with air traffic. The cost estimate is about 20 times as much as the distribution of dust in the stratosphere,[28] making these schemes economically nonviable. The large number of reflectors and the trash problem posed by their fall make the system unattractive.
Cloud seeding
Main article: Cloud Seeding
Cloud seeding has been proposed using various methods to distribute the cloud-seeding materials, including airliners[46] and ships or power plants.[47] Reck (1978) studied the effect of increases in cloud cover and, using a radiative-convective atmospheric model, found that a 4 to 5 percent increase in low-level cloud cover would be sufficient to offset the warming predicted from a doubling of preindustrial CO2. This value is in reasonable agreement with Randall et al. (1984), who estimated that a 4 percent increase was required in the amount of marine stratocumulus, which comprises the bulk of the low clouds on a global basis."
See link above to continue reading this article.
See link above to continue reading this article.
Another link to check out:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratospheric_Particle_Injection_for_Climate_Engineering
Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering (SPICE) is a United Kingdom government-funded geoengineering research project that aims to assess the feasibility of injecting particles into the stratosphere from a tethered balloon for the purposes of solar radiation management.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oK7wmP2CFk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OStBmU4Q-PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuWTLFaHzU0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lK9vF63Jwn8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvEA2fhh0fs
See You next time!
Of course, one more great performance!!!(by Me)
The photoshoot of this web formation to the music of Stevie Ray!!!!
project Sky Poop 0001
O+O
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi Everybody! Please say hello and follow so I know you are here! Due to the inconsideration of people trying to put commercials on my blog comment area, I have restricted use of anonymous posts. Sorry that some hurt all.
My public email is katescabin@gmail.com No spammers or trolls